As a result of today’s talks, here’s the updated body-count (all four experiments with a lot of overlap):
| Particle | Original discovery | Method of observation in the LHC experiments |
| Electron/positron | 1896 (e-), 1932 (e+) | Peak at 1.0 in calorimeter energy to track momentum ratio, also observed in pairs from photon conversions in matter (X γ → X e+e- where X is a nucleus) |
| Photon | 1900 (Planck’s quanta) | Photon conversions and π0→ γγ |
| Proton | 1911 | Energy loss charged particle’s trajectory (dE/dx) |
| Deuteron | 1931 | Also seen in dE/dx |
| Muon | 1936 | Specialized muon detectors |
| Pion | 1950 (π0) | Neutral pion in π0→ γγ, charged pions in dE/dx |
| Eta meson | 1961 | η → γγ |
| Kaon | 1947 (KS) | Neutral kaon in KS → π+π-, charged kaons (K+ and K-) in dE/dx and ring-imaging Cerenkov detectors |
| Phi meson | 1962 | φ → K+ K- |
| Lambda | 1947 (Λ0) | Λ0→ π+p- / Λ0→ π-p+ |
| Xi baryon | 1964 | Ξ → π Λ0 |
|
|
|
|
| Dark matter WIMPs | not yet | two candidates in the unblinded signal region of the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS) (not an LHC experiment) |
The last entry is for yesterday’s CDMS paper, which shows two candidate events surviving all analysis cuts, set prior to looking at the result (unblinding). The probability for background fluctuating up to account for these two events is 20-23%, so no one is calling it a signal. Both are close to the edges of the analysis cuts, so even if the observed events had significantly exceeded the background estimates, there would be room for doubt. This may be the tip of the iceberg for direct dark matter detection, but then again, it may not.



